Aderhold v. England
73 F.2d 91, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2604
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1934
DocketNo. 7513
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 73 F.2d 91 (Aderhold v. England) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aderhold v. England, 73 F.2d 91, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2604 (5th Cir. 1934).
Opinion
By this appeal the warden of the Atlanta Penitentiary contends that the district judge erred in computing deductions from a second [92]*92sentence imposed upon appellee, a prisoner in the penitentiary. The facts upon which the District Court acted are not shown by the petition, or by any evidence in the record.
It follows that the judgment must be, and it is, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trexler v. Tug Raven
290 F. Supp. 429 (E.D. Virginia, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 F.2d 91, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aderhold-v-england-ca5-1934.