Aderer v. Aderer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aderer v. Aderer

258 A.D. 872, 17 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7360

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 872 (Aderer v. Aderer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aderer v. Aderer, 258 A.D. 872, 17 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified by reducing the amount of alimony to be paid to plaintiff for her support and maintenance to the sum of thirty-five dollars per week, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice, reversing findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the decision with respect to an agreement on the part of the defendant to support plaintiff’s child by a prior marriage, and containing new finding in support of the determination here made. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified by reducing the amount of alimony to be paid to plaintiff for her support and maintenance to the sum of thirty-five dollars per week, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice, reversing findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the decision with respect to an agreement on the part of the defendant to support plaintiff’s child by a prior marriage, and containing new finding in support of the determination here made. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 872, 17 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aderer-v-aderer-nyappdiv-1939.