ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON

M.D. Georgia

ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON

DecidedMarch 20, 2025

Docket4:25-cv-00093

StatusUnknown

This text of ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON (ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON, (M.D. Ga. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

A.O.A., : : Petitioner, : : v. : Case No. 4:25-cv-93-CDL-AGH : 28 U.S.C. § 2241 TERRENCE DICKERSON, : : Respondent. : _________________________________

AMENDED ORDER On March 17, 2025, the Court directed Respondent to file a comprehensive response to Petitioner’s application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF Nos. 3, 1). Having further considered Petitioner’s application, the Court amends its Order as follows: The Court questions, without deciding, the continued reliance upon Sopo v. U.S. Attorney General, 825 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2018), vacated by Sopo v. U.S. Attorney General, 890 F.3d 952 (11th Cir. 2018). See, e.g., S.C. v. Warden, No. 4:23-cv- 64, slip op. (M.D. Ga. Dec. 15, 2023) (ECF No. 26). The parties are DIRECTED to address the appropriate test that should be used to determine when the length and nature of the detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) rises to the level of a constitutional violation. S.C., No. 4:23-cv-64, slip op. at 3. Respondent shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file his response which shall address that question. Thereafter, Petitioner shall file a reply addressing the same question within fourteen (14) days. The parties are free to address other issues they deem appropriate, but they must address the Court’s question. The Court will consider requests for additional pages upon the filing of such request. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of March, 2025. s/ Amelia G. Helmick UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

A.O.A., : : Petitioner, : : v. : Case No. 4:25-cv-93-CDL-AGH : 28 U.S.C. § 2241 TERRENCE DICKERSON, : : Respondent. : _________________________________

AMENDED ORDER On March 17, 2025, the Court directed Respondent to file a comprehensive response to Petitioner’s application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF Nos. 3, 1). Having further considered Petitioner’s application, the Court amends its Order as follows: The Court questions, without deciding, the continued reliance upon Sopo v. U.S. Attorney General, 825 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2018), vacated by Sopo v. U.S. Attorney General, 890 F.3d 952 (11th Cir. 2018). See, e.g., S.C. v. Warden, No. 4:23-cv- 64, slip op. (M.D. Ga. Dec. 15, 2023) (ECF No. 26). The parties are DIRECTED to address the appropriate test that should be used to determine when the length and nature of the detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) rises to the level of a constitutional violation. S.C., No. 4:23-cv-64, slip op. at 3. Respondent shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file his response which shall address that question. Thereafter, Petitioner shall file a reply addressing the same question within fourteen (14) days. The parties are free to address other issues they deem appropriate, but they must address the Court’s question. The Court will consider requests for additional pages upon the filing of such request. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of March, 2025. s/ Amelia G. Helmick UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ADENIRAN v. DICKERSON, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adeniran-v-dickerson-gamd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack