Adelstein v. Fessenden

175 A.D. 917

This text of 175 A.D. 917 (Adelstein v. Fessenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adelstein v. Fessenden, 175 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent of precluding plaintiff from giving evidence of representations or threats made to any person other than himself or the attorneys specifically named in his bill of particulars, and also from giving evidence of representations or threats made by any persons other than Messrs. Thornhill and Graham, specifically named in the bill of particulars. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to extent stated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adelstein-v-fessenden-nyappdiv-1916.