Adelsberg v. Bates

278 A.D. 606, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 10, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

A proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Tax Commission imposing unincorporated business taxes upon petitioners for the years 1941 and 1942 under article 16-A of the Tax Law. Petitioners, as copartners, claim exemption from an unincorporated business tax on the ground that the petitioner, Hyman Adelsberg, acting for the partnership, was engaged in a professional occupation. This petitioner claimed to be a valuation expert who by reason of specialized study and knowledge is equipped to handle complex problems relating to the evaluation of real property. Giving every favorable intendment to the claim of petitioners, and conceding the ability of the petitioner, Hyman Adelsberg, as a valuation expert, we find no cogent ground for holding that the latter was engaged in the practice of a profession. Determination unanimously confirmed, with $59 costs and disbursements. Present — Foster, P. J., Hefiiérnan, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adelsberg v. Bates, 278 A.D. 606, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 606 (Adelsberg v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenbloom v. State Tax Commission
44 A.D.2d 69 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Schmidt v. Bates
282 A.D. 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)