Adelsberg v. Bates

278 A.D. 606, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 606 (Adelsberg v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adelsberg v. Bates, 278 A.D. 606, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

A proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Tax Commission imposing unincorporated business taxes upon petitioners for the years 1941 and 1942 under article 16-A of the Tax Law. Petitioners, as copartners, claim exemption from an unincorporated business tax on the ground that the petitioner, Hyman Adelsberg, acting for the partnership, was engaged in a professional occupation. This petitioner claimed to be a valuation expert who by reason of specialized study and knowledge is equipped to handle complex problems relating to the evaluation of real property. Giving every favorable intendment to the claim of petitioners, and conceding the ability of the petitioner, Hyman Adelsberg, as a valuation expert, we find no cogent ground for holding that the latter was engaged in the practice of a profession. Determination unanimously confirmed, with $59 costs and disbursements. Present — Foster, P. J., Hefiiérnan, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenbloom v. State Tax Commission
44 A.D.2d 69 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Schmidt v. Bates
282 A.D. 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 606, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adelsberg-v-bates-nyappdiv-1951.