Adelman v. Adelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adelman v. Adelman

2 A.D.2d 857, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 857 (Adelman v. Adelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adelman v. Adelman, 2 A.D.2d 857, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a separation, defendant appeals from the judgment in favor [858]*858of plaintiff. Judgment modified on the law and the facts by striking from the fifth ordering paragraph the words and figure “Ninety Dollars ($90.00) ” and by substituting therefor the words and figure “Sixty Dollars ($60.00) ”, and by inserting in the third ordering paragraph a provision that defendant shall have the right to have the children visit with him for a period of two weeks during the months of July or August, if they do not go to summer camp, and in the event that either child should go to camp, then to have such right with respect to the child attending camp for the period commencing 48 hours after the termination of the camp stay and ending 24 hours prior to the commencement of the school term in September, but not to exceed two weeks. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, on the record presented, the award of alimony was excessive. The trial court indicated, without objection, that defendant should have visitation rights substantially as above set forth, but provision therefor was omitted from the judgment. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a separation, defendant appeals from the judgment in favor [858]*858of plaintiff. Judgment modified on the law and the facts by striking from the fifth ordering paragraph the words and figure “Ninety Dollars ($90.00) ” and by substituting therefor the words and figure “Sixty Dollars ($60.00) ”, and by inserting in the third ordering paragraph a provision that defendant shall have the right to have the children visit with him for a period of two weeks during the months of July or August, if they do not go to summer camp, and in the event that either child should go to camp, then to have such right with respect to the child attending camp for the period commencing 48 hours after the termination of the camp stay and ending 24 hours prior to the commencement of the school term in September, but not to exceed two weeks. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, on the record presented, the award of alimony was excessive. The trial court indicated, without objection, that defendant should have visitation rights substantially as above set forth, but provision therefor was omitted from the judgment. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 857, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adelman-v-adelman-nyappdiv-1956.