Adeleke v. Bank of America
This text of Adeleke v. Bank of America (Adeleke v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 19, 2004 In the Charles R. Fulbruge III United States Court of Appeals Clerk for the Fifth Circuit _______________
No. 03-10625 Summary Calendar _______________
OLUMUYIWA AYODEJI ADELEKE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas m 3:02-CV-319-L _________________________
Before SMITH, DEMOSS and June 3, 2003, the district court granted sum- STEWART, Circuit Judges. mary judgment to the bank. Adeleke appeals pro se. PER CURIAM:* We affirm, essentially for the reasons given Olumuyiwa Adeleke sued his former em- by the district court. This was an ordinary ployer, claiming violations of title VII. In a workplace dispute, and Adeleke was termi- careful, detailed, and comprehensive order nated for well established and documented rea- signed on May 30, 2002, and entered on sons. As the district court demonstrated, there is no showing that any employment statute was violated. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has deter- mined that this opinion should not be published and is AFFIRMED. not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adeleke v. Bank of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adeleke-v-bank-of-america-ca5-2004.