Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator v. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., and Sanford Health, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 23, 2016·No. A15-1730·Published

Opinion

STATE OF MINNESOTA

March 21, 2016

IN SUPREME COURT Om:ciEOF APPB.I!AIECcunis

A15-1730

Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator,

vs.

JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc.,

Respondents,

and Sanford Health, Intervenor.

Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Denison, Iowa, pro se relator.

William G. Laak, Brian J. Kluk, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller & Laak, Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator's motion to accept new evidence be, and the same is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on September 28, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Dated: March 21, 20 16 BY THE COURT:

David R. Stras

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator v. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., and Sanford Health, Intervenor., (Mich. 2016).

Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator v. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., and Sanford Health, Intervenor. (Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator v. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., and Sanford Health, Intervenor.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)