Adekanmbi v. Holder

442 F. App'x 820
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1992
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 820 (Adekanmbi v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adekanmbi v. Holder, 442 F. App'x 820 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oluwatoyin Osunfunmipe Adekanmbi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) upholding the immigration judge’s denial of her motion for a continuance. We have reviewed the record and Adekanmbi’s claims and find no abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007). We therefore uphold the denial of Ade-kanmbi’s motion for the reasons stated by the Board, see In re Adekanmbi (B.I.A. July 30, 2010), and deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lendo v. Gonzales
493 F.3d 439 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F. App'x 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adekanmbi-v-holder-ca4-2011.