Addonisio v. Dial Corp.

616 So. 2d 71, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1993 WL 62257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1993·No. No. 92-1936·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chrysler Corp. v. Wolmer, 499 So.2d 823 (Fla.1986); Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe, 481 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 491 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1986); Voynar v. Butler Mfg. Co., 463 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985); Losar Mfg. Co. v. Bachanov, 436 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Addonisio v. Dial Corp., 616 So. 2d 71, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1993 WL 62257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 71 (Addonisio v. Dial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Voynar v. Butler Mfg. Co.
463 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe
481 So. 2d 109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bachanov
436 So. 2d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Chrysler Corp. v. Wolmer
499 So. 2d 823 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)