Addo Machine Co. v. Western Carloading Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Addo Machine Co. v. Western Carloading Co.

22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 867 (Addo Machine Co. v. Western Carloading Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Addo Machine Co. v. Western Carloading Co., 22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered June 17, 1964, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to give the third-party plaintiff the right to replead within 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, and order and judgment otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent. As pointed out at Special Term, the third-party plaintiff, has no cause of action against the third-party defendant based on the Carmack Amendment (Interstate Commerce Act, U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 20), and also the third-party complaint does not state a cause on the theory of common-law liability. While it is not clear that the plaintiff has a cause of action on such theory, counsel for the defendant stated upon the argument that he would not oppose the granting of leave to replead. Accordingly, such leave is granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered June 17, 1964, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to give the third-party plaintiff the right to replead within 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, and order and judgment otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent. As pointed out at Special Term, the third-party plaintiff, has no cause of action against the third-party defendant based on the Carmack Amendment (Interstate Commerce Act, U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 20), and also the third-party complaint does not state a cause on the theory of common-law liability. While it is not clear that the plaintiff has a cause of action on such theory, counsel for the defendant stated upon the argument that he would not oppose the granting of leave to replead. Accordingly, such leave is granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addo-machine-co-v-western-carloading-co-nyappdiv-1964.