Addleman v. Erwin
This text of 6 Ind. 494 (Addleman v. Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assumpsit by Addleman against Erwin and others, for money paid, &c. Demand denied. Trial by the Court and judgment for the defendants. The trial was in 1854, under the new practice. No evidence offered was rejected, and none given was excepted to.
A motion for a new trial was made, but not being in writing, it could not be noticed. McKinney v. Springer, ante, p. 453. Another course might have been pursued to get the questions made below before this Court. The party might have required the Court to make a special statement of the facts and the questions of law decided thereon, and then excepted to the decision, and thus prepared the case for this Court. 2 E. S., 115, s. 341. This was not done, and the record presents no question for our consideration.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ind. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addleman-v-erwin-ind-1855.