Addison v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Addison v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc.

384 F. App'x 265

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1186·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cecil D. Addison appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII complaint for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Addison v. Volvo Trucks of N. Am., Inc., No. 7:09-cv-00088-sgw-mfu (W.D.Va. Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cecil D. Addison appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII complaint for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Addison v. Volvo Trucks of N. Am., Inc., No. 7:09-cv-00088-sgw-mfu (W.D.Va. Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Addison v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc., 384 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

384 F. App'x 265 (Addison v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.