Addison v. Duckett

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Addison v. Duckett

1 F. Cas. 170, 1 Cranch 349

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedOctober 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F. Cas. 170 (Addison v. Duckett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Addison v. Duckett, 1 F. Cas. 170, 1 Cranch 349 (circtddc 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT refused to consider the answer as sufficiently certified, and refused to dissolve the injunction. The court cited the cases of Wright v. West, [Case No. 18.102,] and Lloyd v. Lund, [Id. 8,433,] at Alexandria, March, 1806; Watson v. Tapscot, [Id. 17,290,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Potts v. Ghequere, [Id. 11,346,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Wilson v. Stewart, [Id. 17,837,] Alexandria, June, 1803; Mandeville v. Ringgold, [Id. 9,015,] Alexandria; and Tibbs v. Parrott, [Cases 14,-022, 14,023,] Washington, June, 1806.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT refused to consider the answer as sufficiently certified, and refused to dissolve the injunction. The court cited the cases of Wright v. West, [Case No. 18.102,] and Lloyd v. Lund, [Id. 8,433,] at Alexandria, March, 1806; Watson v. Tapscot, [Id. 17,290,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Potts v. Ghequere, [Id. 11,346,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Wilson v. Stewart, [Id. 17,837,] Alexandria, June, 1803; Mandeville v. Ringgold, [Id. 9,015,] Alexandria; and Tibbs v. Parrott, [Cases 14,-022, 14,023,] Washington, June, 1806.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F. Cas. 170, 1 Cranch 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addison-v-duckett-circtddc-1806.