Addison v. Addison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Addison v. Addison

530 S.W.2d 920, 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 3289

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

Docket16551

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 530 S.W.2d 920 (Addison v. Addison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Addison v. Addison, 530 S.W.2d 920, 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 3289 (Tex. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

EVANS, Justice.

Appellant, Lynell Green Addison, obtained issuance of a writ of garnishment against Texas Southern University asserting a judgment indebtedness against her former husband, William A. Addison, in the amount of $400.00 as a result of an award entered in prior divorce proceedings. Ap-pellee, William A. Addison, filed a motion to quash the writ of garnishment, averring that Texas Southern University is an agency of the State of Texas and therefore is exempt from garnishment. Texas Southern University did not file an answer to the writ of garnishment, but after hearing ap-pellee’s motion, the trial court quashed the writ of garnishment and ordered that all funds held by Texas Southern University by virtue of the writ be released.

We are required to take judicial notice of the public statutes of this state, including pertinent portions of the Constitution and statutes relative to the establishment and operation of state universities. University of Texas v. Booker, 282 S.W.2d *921 740, 742 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana, 1955, no writ); McCormick & Ray, Texas Law of Evidence, Sec. 171, p. 180. Texas Southern University was established by the Texas legislature, pursuant to the mandate of Article VII, Sec. 10, of the Texas Constitution, as a branch of the University of Texas System of Higher Education. Tex.Educ. Code Ann., Title 3, Ch. 106, pp. 235-239. The government of Texas Southern University is vested in its board of regents appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the senate. Section 106.11. All expenditures of Texas Southern University are paid on warrants issued by the State Comptroller on vouchers approved by the appropriate officer of its board. Sec. 106.32.

Public policy exempts from garnishment or execution departments of the state which are performing governmental functions. Delta County Levee Imp. Dist. No. 2 v. Leonard, 516 S.W.2d 911, 912 (Tex.1974); National Sur. Corp. v. Friendswood Independent School Dist., 433 S.W.2d 690, 694 (Tex.1968); Willacy County Water Control & Imp. Dist. No. 1 v. Abendroth, 142 Tex. 320, 177 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex.1944). As a state institution, Texas Southern University and its board of regents are exempt from garnishment proceedings. Splawn v. Woodard, 287 S.W. 677, 681 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin, 1926, no writ); University of Texas v. Booker, supra. Appellee had a direct interest in the proceedings and was entitled to attack the issued writ by motion to quash. Cleveland v. San Antonio Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 148 Tex. 211, 223 S.W.2d 226, 229 (Tex.1949); Rule 664, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EVANS, Justice.

Appellant, Lynell Green Addison, obtained issuance of a writ of garnishment against Texas Southern University asserting a judgment indebtedness against her former husband, William A. Addison, in the amount of $400.00 as a result of an award entered in prior divorce proceedings. Ap-pellee, William A. Addison, filed a motion to quash the writ of garnishment, averring that Texas Southern University is an agency of the State of Texas and therefore is exempt from garnishment. Texas Southern University did not file an answer to the writ of garnishment, but after hearing ap-pellee’s motion, the trial court quashed the writ of garnishment and ordered that all funds held by Texas Southern University by virtue of the writ be released.

We are required to take judicial notice of the public statutes of this state, including pertinent portions of the Constitution and statutes relative to the establishment and operation of state universities. University of Texas v. Booker, 282 S.W.2d *921 740, 742 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana, 1955, no writ); McCormick & Ray, Texas Law of Evidence, Sec. 171, p. 180. Texas Southern University was established by the Texas legislature, pursuant to the mandate of Article VII, Sec. 10, of the Texas Constitution, as a branch of the University of Texas System of Higher Education. Tex.Educ. Code Ann., Title 3, Ch. 106, pp. 235-239. The government of Texas Southern University is vested in its board of regents appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the senate. Section 106.11. All expenditures of Texas Southern University are paid on warrants issued by the State Comptroller on vouchers approved by the appropriate officer of its board. Sec. 106.32.

Public policy exempts from garnishment or execution departments of the state which are performing governmental functions. Delta County Levee Imp. Dist. No. 2 v. Leonard, 516 S.W.2d 911, 912 (Tex.1974); National Sur. Corp. v. Friendswood Independent School Dist., 433 S.W.2d 690, 694 (Tex.1968); Willacy County Water Control & Imp. Dist. No. 1 v. Abendroth, 142 Tex. 320, 177 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex.1944). As a state institution, Texas Southern University and its board of regents are exempt from garnishment proceedings. Splawn v. Woodard, 287 S.W. 677, 681 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin, 1926, no writ); University of Texas v. Booker, supra. Appellee had a direct interest in the proceedings and was entitled to attack the issued writ by motion to quash. Cleveland v. San Antonio Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 148 Tex. 211, 223 S.W.2d 226, 229 (Tex.1949); Rule 664, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.W.2d 920, 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 3289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addison-v-addison-texapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack