Addie Mae Rose v. United States

283 F.2d 376
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1960
Docket15575
StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 376 (Addie Mae Rose v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Addie Mae Rose v. United States, 283 F.2d 376 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of second degree murder. D.C.Code § 22-2403 (1951). Her chief contention on appeal is that the District Court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity. We cannot agree. On the testimony here, the issue was properly one for the jury, and we have concluded “that the result is rationally consistent with the evidence, measured by the required degree of proof.” Douglas v. United States, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 232, at page 239, 239 F. 2d 52, at page 59; cf. Satterwhite v. United States, 1959, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 267 F.2d 675. We find no reversible error as to this or any of the other matters urged by appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald W. Satterwhite v. United States
267 F.2d 675 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F.2d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addie-mae-rose-v-united-states-cadc-1960.