Adderly v. State
132 So. 3d 1234, 2014 WL 784852, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2590
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 2014
DocketNo. 3D12-2702
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 132 So. 3d 1234 (Adderly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adderly v. State, 132 So. 3d 1234, 2014 WL 784852, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
We affirm Maurice Adderl/s conviction and sentence without prejudice to him filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. See Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 437-38 (Fla.2001) (“A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may be raised on direct appeal only where the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martinez v. State
260 So. 3d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Reid v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Mathis v. State
204 So. 3d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 1234, 2014 WL 784852, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adderly-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.