Adderly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adderly v. State

671 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3994, 1996 WL 184524

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 17, 1996

DocketNo. 95-0298

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 671 So. 2d 881 (Adderly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adderly v. State, 671 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3994, 1996 WL 184524 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion of January 24, 1996, and substitute the following opinion.

Appellant violated the conditions of community control and, pursuant to plea agreement, was sentenced to three years in prison as a habitual offender with two years of community control to be followed by ten years probation. Although the trial court orally pronounced that appellant would receive 404 days credit toward the community control portion of his new sentence for time previously served on community control, the court failed to include this credit on the written order. We remand so that the trial court may correct this omission. In all other respects, we affirm.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion of January 24, 1996, and substitute the following opinion.

Appellant violated the conditions of community control and, pursuant to plea agreement, was sentenced to three years in prison as a habitual offender with two years of community control to be followed by ten years probation. Although the trial court orally pronounced that appellant would receive 404 days credit toward the community control portion of his new sentence for time previously served on community control, the court failed to include this credit on the written order. We remand so that the trial court may correct this omission. In all other respects, we affirm.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3994, 1996 WL 184524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adderly-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack