Adderly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adderly v. State

511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2114, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10100

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 2, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-2860

StatusPublished

This text of 511 So. 2d 766 (Adderly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adderly v. State, 511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2114, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10100 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals both his convictions and his sentences. We affirm. However, on remand the trial court is directed to amend its sentencing order by adding a notation that the sentences were not imposed pursuant to the Guidelines and that, therefore, appellant is entitled to eligibility for parole. See Thrower v. State, 491 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals both his convictions and his sentences. We affirm. However, on remand the trial court is directed to amend its sentencing order by adding a notation that the sentences were not imposed pursuant to the Guidelines and that, therefore, appellant is entitled to eligibility for parole. See Thrower v. State, 491 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2114, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adderly-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack