Adderly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adderly v. State

511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2114, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10100

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2860·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals both his convictions and his sentences. We affirm. However, on remand the trial court is directed to amend its sentencing order by adding a notation that the sentences were not imposed pursuant to the Guidelines and that, therefore, appellant is entitled to eligibility for parole. See Thrower v. State, 491 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals both his convictions and his sentences. We affirm. However, on remand the trial court is directed to amend its sentencing order by adding a notation that the sentences were not imposed pursuant to the Guidelines and that, therefore, appellant is entitled to eligibility for parole. See Thrower v. State, 491 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER D., Associate Judge, concur.

Adderly v. State, 511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2114, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10100 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

511 So. 2d 766 (Adderly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related