Adderley v. Countrywide

Fourth Circuit

Adderley v. Countrywide

613 F. App'x 222

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2015·No. No. 15-1415·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Adderley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[223] mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adderley v. Countrywide Mortg., No. 3:14—cv-04893-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would hot aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Adderley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[223] mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adderley v. Countrywide Mortg., No. 3:14—cv-04893-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would hot aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Adderley v. Countrywide, 613 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

613 F. App'x 222 (Adderley v. Countrywide) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.