Adderley v. Countrywide

Fourth Circuit

Adderley v. Countrywide

613 F. App'x 222

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 24, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1415

StatusPublished

This text of 613 F. App'x 222 (Adderley v. Countrywide) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adderley v. Countrywide, 613 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Adderley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[223]*223mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adderley v. Countrywide Mortg., No. 3:14—cv-04893-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would hot aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Adderley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[223]*223mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adderley v. Countrywide Mortg., No. 3:14—cv-04893-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would hot aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adderley-v-countrywide-ca4-2015.