Addabbo v. O'Rourke

New York Court of Appeals

Addabbo v. O'Rourke

261 N.E.2d 904, 27 N.Y.2d 645, 313 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1193

DecidedJune 16, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.E.2d 904 (Addabbo v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Addabbo v. O'Rourke, 261 N.E.2d 904, 27 N.Y.2d 645, 313 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1193 (N.Y. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum.: The appellant, not being an enrolled member of the Democratic Party, is ineligible to be a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election. The requirement of enrollment in the Democratic Party to entitle one to be a candidate in a party primary election does not violate the Constitution of the United States.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum.: The appellant, not being an enrolled member of the Democratic Party, is ineligible to be a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election. The requirement of enrollment in the Democratic Party to entitle one to be a candidate in a party primary election does not violate the Constitution of the United States.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.E.2d 904, 27 N.Y.2d 645, 313 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addabbo-v-orourke-ny-1970.