Adcock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adcock v. State

861 So. 2d 1213, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18725, 2003 WL 22900439

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 2003

DocketNo. 2D03-2997

StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 1213 (Adcock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adcock v. State, 861 So. 2d 1213, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18725, 2003 WL 22900439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gordon W. Adcock challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that it was facially insufficient. Our affirmance of the trial court’s order is without prejudice to any right Adcock might have to file a facially sufficient motion raising the same claim within sixty days from the issuance of the mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gordon W. Adcock challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that it was facially insufficient. Our affirmance of the trial court’s order is without prejudice to any right Adcock might have to file a facially sufficient motion raising the same claim within sixty days from the issuance of the mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 1213, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18725, 2003 WL 22900439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adcock-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.