Adan Esquibel v. State
This text of Adan Esquibel v. State (Adan Esquibel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00400-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
GEORGE HARRY DAVIS, JR., Appellant,
v.
TAMELA LASHAWN PARKS, Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 1st District Court of Jasper County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Benavides and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, George Harry Davis, Jr., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered
by the 1st District Court of Jasper County, Texas, in cause number 29,770. Appellant has
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that he no longer desires to pursue the
appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of
the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal
at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 22nd day of October, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adan Esquibel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adan-esquibel-v-state-texapp-2009.