Adamson v. Haldane Central School District of Philipstown
This text of 77 A.D.2d 652 (Adamson v. Haldane Central School District of Philipstown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent board of education which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner’s employment. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The notice of charges sufficiently apprised petitioner of the charges against him so as to enable him to adequately prepare and present a defense (see Matter of Fitzgerald v Libous, 56 AD2d 981, affd 44 NY2d 660). The board’s determination as to petitioner’s incompetence is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Furthermore, the penalty imposed (termination of employment) was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A.D.2d 652, 430 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adamson-v-haldane-central-school-district-of-philipstown-nyappdiv-1980.