Adamson v. Bureau of Labor & Indus.

415 P.3d 1153, 291 Or. App. 445
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 18, 2018
DocketA165559
StatusPublished

This text of 415 P.3d 1153 (Adamson v. Bureau of Labor & Indus.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adamson v. Bureau of Labor & Indus., 415 P.3d 1153, 291 Or. App. 445 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*446Under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks a judicial determination of the validity of four administrative rules adopted by the Bureau of Labor and Industries, arguing that OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 are unconstitutionally overbroad under the free exercise clauses in Article I, sections 2 and 3, of the Oregon Constitution. Having reviewed petitioner's arguments, we conclude that the rules challenged by him are valid.

OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 held valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 183.400
Oregon § 183.400

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 P.3d 1153, 291 Or. App. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adamson-v-bureau-of-labor-indus-orctapp-2018.