Adamson v. Adamson

439 P.2d 854, 21 Utah 2d 39, 1968 Utah LEXIS 581
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1968
DocketNo. 11033
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 P.2d 854 (Adamson v. Adamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adamson v. Adamson, 439 P.2d 854, 21 Utah 2d 39, 1968 Utah LEXIS 581 (Utah 1968).

Opinion

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

The attorney who represented the plaintiff in this action for divorce presents to this court the question whether he has a right in himself, independent of his client, to enforce an award of attorney’s fees.

This action was commenced in October, 1966. The following month, after the filing of an answer and counterclaim, a hearing was held with respect to the payment of temporary alimony, support money and attorney’s fees. The court entered an order which provided, inter alia, that the defendant should pay a preliminary attorney’s fee. Before the case came to trial, on New Year’s Eve, December 31, 1966, the plaintiff, Phyllis Adamson, was killed in an automobile accident. Pursuant to a further hearing on the matter, in March, 1967, the court made another order that the defendant pay additional attorney’s fees for work done in the case. The attorney’s fee was not paid, garnishment issued, and responsive to a proper motion, the garnishment was quashed. It is from this ruling that the attorney prosecutes this appeal.

The attorney is not a party to the proceeding and by himself has no right to carry it on. See a good statement of the law on this point by Woolley, District Judge, in the case of Openshaw v. Openshaw, 80 Utah 9, 12 P.2d 364. See also Albrechtsen v. Albrechtsen, 18 Utah 2d 55, 414 P.2d 970; Bell v. Bell, 214 Ala. 573, 108 So. 375, 45 A.L.R. 935; and Beach v. Beach, 99 Ohio App. 428, 438, 130 N.E.2d 164. The attorney’s entitlement to fees is derived through and is enforceable through his client. The trial court acted correctly in granting the motion to quash the garnishment.

Affirmed. Costs to defendant (respondent).

CALLISTER, TUCKETT, HENRIOD and ELLETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. McDonald
866 P.2d 1253 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 P.2d 854, 21 Utah 2d 39, 1968 Utah LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adamson-v-adamson-utah-1968.