Adams v. William E. Bouley Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. William E. Bouley Co.

55 A.D.2d 1014, 391 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 1014 (Adams v. William E. Bouley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. William E. Bouley Co., 55 A.D.2d 1014, 391 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on opinion at Onondaga Special Term, Mead, J., and the following memorandum: We add that the notice on the original summons was erroneous because the insurance company’s subrogated claim on which it was based included items relating to plaintiff-respondent’s expenses for her personal injuries as well as for property damages. The action on these claims was timely instituted; and it was proper to grant the amendment. (See, also, Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Perricone, 54 AD2d 975.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — summary judgment, etc.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on opinion at Onondaga Special Term, Mead, J., and the following memorandum: We add that the notice on the original summons was erroneous because the insurance company’s subrogated claim on which it was based included items relating to plaintiff-respondent’s expenses for her personal injuries as well as for property damages. The action on these claims was timely instituted; and it was proper to grant the amendment. (See, also, Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Perricone, 54 AD2d 975.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — summary judgment, etc.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 1014, 391 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-william-e-bouley-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack