Adams v. Wayposset Manufacturing Co.

10 R.I. Dec. 99
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 1, 1933
DocketW. C. A. No. 1506
StatusPublished

This text of 10 R.I. Dec. 99 (Adams v. Wayposset Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Wayposset Manufacturing Co., 10 R.I. Dec. 99 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

SUMNER, J.

Petitioner, who was a weaver in the mill of the respondent company, has filed his petition under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

He claims that he bumped his knee against one of the looms that he was operating and that subsequently a bone abscess on the right fibula developed which required an operation on his leg at a hospital. He further claims total incapacity for a certain period and partial incapacity later.

The petitioner has made contradictory statements at different times which serve to ’ impair his veracity, and the medical testimony does not clearly establish the causality of the alleged injury.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 R.I. Dec. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-wayposset-manufacturing-co-risuperct-1933.