Adams v. Vanzandt

150 So. 808, 227 Ala. 553, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 66
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 16, 1933
Docket7 Div. 220.
StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 808 (Adams v. Vanzandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Vanzandt, 150 So. 808, 227 Ala. 553, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 66 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

Petition of H. E. Adams for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and.decision of that court in Adams v. Vanzandt, 25 Ala. App. 527, 150 So. 807.

The Court of Appeals finds as a fact that defendant’s special plea “as drawn and' filed had no support in the evidence,” and the writ is denied on the authority of Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Vanzandt
150 So. 807 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout
71 So. 91 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 808, 227 Ala. 553, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-vanzandt-ala-1933.