Adams v. Trigg

35 Mo. 190
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117.)

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Trigg, 35 Mo. 190 (Mo. 1864).

35 Mo. 190 (Adams v. Trigg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neyens v. Flesher
79 N.E. 1087 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)
People ex rel. Phillips v. Severson
113 Ill. App. 496 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
Lipe v. Fox
21 Colo. 140 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1895)
Dusing v. Nelson
4 Colo. L. Rep. 508 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1884)