Adams v. Trigg

Supreme Court of Missouri

Adams v. Trigg

35 Mo. 190

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 35 Mo. 190 (Adams v. Trigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Trigg, 35 Mo. 190 (Mo. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117.)

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117.)

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Mo. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-trigg-mo-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack