Adams v. . Transit Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Adams v. . Transit Co.

135 S.E. 454, 192 N.C. 549, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 343

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 17, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 135 S.E. 454 (Adams v. . Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. . Transit Co., 135 S.E. 454, 192 N.C. 549, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 343 (N.C. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

(For digest see Harrison v. Transit Co., next preceding case.) The plaintiff in each of these cases brought suit to recover damages for personal injury caused by the negligence of the Southern Transit Corporation. This defendant filed answers in the two cases; but the Casualty Company demurred to the complaints for misjoinder of parties defendant and of causes of action. The decision in Harrison v. SouthernTransit Corporation et al. controls in the disposition of these appeals.

In each case the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(For digest see Harrison v. Transit Co., next preceding case.) The plaintiff in each of these cases brought suit to recover damages for personal injury caused by the negligence of the Southern Transit Corporation. This defendant filed answers in the two cases; but the Casualty Company demurred to the complaints for misjoinder of parties defendant and of causes of action. The decision in Harrison v. SouthernTransit Corporation et al. controls in the disposition of these appeals.

In each case the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 454, 192 N.C. 549, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-transit-co-nc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack