Adams v. Thomas

6 Binn. 254, 1814 Pa. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 31, 1814·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case of the petitioner is not within the act of 1764. That act provides for the case where a sheriff has made no deed; but the late sheriff has executed a deed to the petitioner, which it is said has not been acknowledged in due form of law. The acknowledgment is no part of the deed; it is only the sanction of the Court to the act of the sheriff. The practice has been for sheriffs, after their term of office has expired, to acknowledge deeds for lands sold by them, and executed whilst they were in office; and the Court is of opinion that such acknowledgments are sufficient. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Thomas, 6 Binn. 254, 1814 Pa. LEXIS 8 (Pa. 1814).

6 Binn. 254 (Adams v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bellas v. M'Carty
10 Watts 13 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)
Thompson v. Phillips
23 F. Cas. 1070 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1830)