Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Adams v. Taylor

Adams v. Taylor

94 So. 920, 208 Ala. 695
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 2, 1922
Docket4 Div. 953.
StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 920 (Adams v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Taylor, 94 So. 920, 208 Ala. 695 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The general affirmative charge was properly given for defendant, and the judgment is affirmed. McCreary v. Jackson Co., 168 Ala. 208, 53 South. 103; Chastang v. Chastang, 141 Ala. 451, 37 South. 799, 109 Am. St. Rep. 45.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chastang v. Chastang
141 Ala. 451 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)
McCreary v. Jackson Lumber Co.
53 So. 103 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 So. 920, 208 Ala. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-taylor-ala-1922.