Adams v. Target Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJuly 20, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-00719
StatusUnknown

This text of Adams v. Target Corporation (Adams v. Target Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Target Corporation, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 SPO LOREN S. YOUNG, ESQ. 2 Nevada Bar No. 7567 LINCOLN, GUSTAFSON & CERCOS, LLP 3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7670 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 200 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Telephone: (702) 257-1997 5 Facsimile: (702) 257-2203 lyoung@lgclawoffice.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant, 7 TARGET CORPORATION

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10

11 ANGELA ADAMS, individually; CASE NO: 2:25-CV-00719

12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER TARGET CORPORATION d/b/a TARGET, a REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL 15 foreign corporation; DOE SECURITY MATERIALS OFFICER; DOE MANAGER; ROE SECURITY 16 COMPANY; DOES 1-10, inclusive; and ROE As amended on pages 3-5 BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER 20 The parties have agreed to the following terms of confidentiality, and the court has found that 21 good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pre-trial 22 phase of this case only; accordingly, it is STIPULATED and ORDERED as follows: 23 1. Any person subject to this order who receives from any other person any discovery material 24 (i.e., information of any kind provided in the course of discovery in this action) that is designated 25 confidential pursuant to the terms of this order shall not disclose such “confidential discovery 26 material” to anyone else except as expressly permitted by this order. 27 2. Any person producing discovery material may designate as confidential only such portion of 28 the material that consists of: 1 a. previously nondisclosed financial information (including without limitation 2 profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum 3 guarantee payments, sales reports and sale margins); 4 b. security camera videos; 5 c. previously nondisclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public 6 company; 7 d. previously nondisclosed business plans, product development information, policies and 8 procedures, trade secret information, or marketing plans; 9 e. any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or 10 f. any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the court. 11 3. With respect to the confidential portion of any discovery material, other than deposition 12 transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person’s counsel may designate such portion as 13 confidential by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “CONFIDENTIAL” the protected portion 14 in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 15 4. With respect to deposition transcripts and exhibits, a producing person or that person’s counsel 16 may indicate on the record that a question calls for confidential information, in which case the 17 transcript of the designated testimony shall be bound in a separate volume and marked 18 “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION GOVERNED BY PROTECTIVE ORDER” by the reporter. 19 5. If at any time prior to the trial of this action, a producing person realizes that some portion(s) 20 of discovery material that that person previously produced should be designated confidential, he may 21 make the designation by apprising all parties in writing and providing a replacement copy of the 22 discovery material with the confidential designation, upon which such discovery material will be 23 treated as confidential under the terms of this order. 24 6. No person subject to this order other than the producing person shall disclose any confidential 25 discovery material to any other person, except as follows: 26 a. the parties to this action and any of their in-house counsel specifically assigned to work 27 on this case; 1 b. counsel of record, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant employed by such 2 counsel and assigned to work on this case; 3 c. as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face 4 of the document as having received a copy; 5 d. any witness who counsel of record in good faith believes may be called to testify at 6 trial or deposition in this case, provided such person has first executed the non- 7 disclosure agreement in the form annexed as an exhibit to this order; 8 e. any person retained by a party to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide 9 specialized advice to counsel in connection with this case, provided such person has 10 first executed the non-disclosure agreement in the form annexed as an exhibit to this 11 order; 12 f. stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions conducted in this action; and 13 g. the court and its personnel. 14 7. Counsel of record shall retain any non-disclosure agreement signed pursuant to paragraph 5, 15 hold it in escrow, and produce it to opposing counsel either prior to the signatory being permitted to 16 testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case, whichever comes first. 17 8. With respect to any communications to the Court, including any pleadings, motions or other 18 papers, all documents containing Confidential Material shall be done in accordance with Local Rules 19 IA 10-4 and IA 10-5, in additions to the directives set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of 20 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 21 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016). All communications shall indicate clearly which portions are designated 22 to be “Confidential” through a Motion to Seal and/or redaction. 23 9. Any party seeking to file confidential discovery material with the court must file a motion to 24 seal and/or redact consistent with Local Rule IA 10-5 and LR IC 4-1(c), and the Nevada Rules for 25 Sealing and Redacting Court Records as outlined in SRCR Rule 3. The parties will use their best 26 efforts to minimize such motions and sealing. 27 10. The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed 1 is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in ^ 2 access to the court record. The parties’ agreement alone does not constitute a sufficient basis for the 3 court to seal or redact court records. The public interest in privacy or safety interests that outweigh the may include findings that: 4 public interest in open court records include findings that: 5 a. The sealing or redaction is permitted or required by federal or state law; 6 b. The sealing or redaction furthers an order entered under FRCP 12(f) or a protective 7 order entered under FRCP 26(c); 8 c. The sealing or redaction furthers an order entered in accordance with federal or state 9 laws that serve to protect the public health and safety; 10 d. The redaction includes only restricted personal information contained in the court 11 record; 12 e. The sealing or redaction is of the confidential terms of a settlement agreement of the 13 parties; 14 f. The sealing or redaction includes medical, mental health, or tax records; 15 g. The sealing or redaction is necessary to protect intellectual proprietary or property 16 interests such as trade secrets as defined in NRS 600A.030(5); or 17 h. The sealing or redaction is justified or required by another identified compelling 18 circumstance or good cause. 19 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Sugarbaker
809 F.3d 8 (First Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adams v. Target Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-target-corporation-nvd-2025.