Adams v. Surlock
This text of 261 A.D. 874 (Adams v. Surlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the finding of freedom from contributory negligence is against the weight of the evidence and on the further ground that there was error in the court’s ruling on the requests to charge. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 874, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-surlock-nyappdiv-1941.