Adams v. State
This text of 417 S.W.2d 68 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment was assessed at forty years.
Trial was had after January 1, 1966.
After the jury found the appellant guilty, he elected to have the court assess the punishment, which was done.
No appellate brief has been filed by the appellant with the clerk of the trial court.
Appellant was represented by counsel at the trial and there is no showing that his counsel was appointed by the court or that the appellant was indigent.
The record contains nothing which should be considered as unassigned error under Art. 40.09, Sec. 13, C.C.P.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 S.W.2d 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-texcrimapp-1967.