Adams v. State
148 S.W. 1090, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 Tex. Crim. 220 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at three years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The only ground of the motion for new trial complains of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict of the jury and judgment of the court. There is no merit under this record in that contention, the facts not having been sent up, and the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. State, 148 S.W. 1090, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 720 (Tex. 1912).
148 S.W. 1090 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.