Adams v. State

1962 OK CR 64, 372 P.2d 884, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 6, 1962
DocketNo. A-13101
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1962 OK CR 64 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 1962 OK CR 64, 372 P.2d 884, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227 (Okla. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

NIX, Presiding Judge.

This is an attempted appeal by Lonnie Adams who was convicted of assault and battery and sentenced to 30 days in the County Jail and to pay a fine of $100.00.

The record reflects that Plaintiff-in-Error was ordered committed to the County Jail to begin his sentence on the 18th day of April, 1961. An attempted appeal was lodged in this Court on August 16, 1961. It is to be noted that the attempted appeal was on the last day prescribed by statute. The record contained no formal Judgment and Sentence. The Defendant subsequently attempts to supplement his case-made with a copy of the Judgment and Sentence. The Attorney General files a motion to dismiss upon the grounds that this Court has no jurisdiction. This matter has been squarely passed upon in the case of Smith v. State, Okl.Cr., 362 P.2d 113, wherein the Court said:

“Where casemade does not contain a formal judgment and sentence, the record cannot be considered even as a transcript, and the appeal will be dismissed.”

In said case, the Court further said: (Page 116)

“The defendant now tenders the journal entry of judgment to this Court, long after the time for appeal had expired. Since this Court must acquire jurisdiction before the time to perfect an appeal has expired, after the expiration of said time fixed by law, if the court has never acquired jurisdiction, we are without authority of law to extend the time for acquiring jurisdiction. To hold otherwise would abrogate the law as enacted by the legislature.”

For the above and foregoing reason, Appeal is Dismissed.

BRETT and BUSSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Condo v. State
1964 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1962 OK CR 64, 372 P.2d 884, 1962 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-oklacrimapp-1962.