Adams v. State

1909 OK CR 149, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 207, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Okla. Crim. 347
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 22, 1909·No. No. 278.·Published

Opinion

PEE CTJEIAM.

Motion having been filed in the above-entitled cause to dismiss the appeal, on the grounds that notices to the county attorney of said county and the clerk of the district court that the defendant appeals from the judgment rendered, have never been ¿sferved as required by section 5610, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. 1903, and notice of said motion to dismiss having been served as required by rule 6 of the rules of this court (1 Okla. Cr. xi, 101 Pac. viii), and no appearance having been made to resist said motion, the court, finds there is nothing in the record showing proof of service of notices that appellant appeals from the judgment as required by law. Upon the record before us, there is nothing which confers jurisdiction upon this court to review the errors set forth in the petition in error. There is no case in this court. For the reason stated, the purported appeal is dismissed, at the cost of plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 1909 OK CR 149, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 207, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

1909 OK CR 149 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.