Adams v. State
This text of 46 Ind. 118 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
was an indictment against the appellant for an assault and battery with intent to murder. On [119]*119a trial by jury, the defendant was found guilty, a motion made by him for a new trial was overruled, and sentence was pronounced against him.
The third error assigned is, that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial. This error is confessed by the Attorney General, and counsel for appellant do not ask a decision of the questions presented by the other assignments.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Ind. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-ind-1874.