Adams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. State

32 S.E.2d 403, 71 Ga. App. 776, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 29, 1944

Docket30681.

StatusPublished

This text of 32 S.E.2d 403 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State, 32 S.E.2d 403, 71 Ga. App. 776, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted of “the offense of keeping, maintaining, and operating a lottery, known as the ‘number game,’ for the hazarding of money.” His certiorari was overruled and the case is here for review. The evidence involved, the objections made throughout the trial, and the assignments of error as to all conten *777 tions, are similar to, if not almost identical with, the evidence and the assignments of error urged in Mills v. State, 71 Ga. App. 353 (30 S. E. 2d, 824), and are therefore controlled by what this court there held. We can say no more here than we have already said in the Mills case. The court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Decided November 29, 1944. Barreil & Ilayes, W. Paul Carpenter, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Camp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Bye, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted of “the offense of keeping, maintaining, and operating a lottery, known as the ‘number game,’ for the hazarding of money.” His certiorari was overruled and the case is here for review. The evidence involved, the objections made throughout the trial, and the assignments of error as to all conten *777 tions, are similar to, if not almost identical with, the evidence and the assignments of error urged in Mills v. State, 71 Ga. App. 353 (30 S. E. 2d, 824), and are therefore controlled by what this court there held. We can say no more here than we have already said in the Mills case. The court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Decided November 29, 1944. Barreil & Ilayes, W. Paul Carpenter, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Camp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Bye, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 S.E.2d 403, 71 Ga. App. 776, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-gactapp-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack