Adams v. State

136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1927
Docket17778
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 330 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The petition for certiorari in this ease set forth that certain evidence was admitted over the objection of the defendant. However, the petition contained no assignment of error upon this ruling, and hence that question could not be considered by either the superior court or this court. See, in this connection, Lowenstein v. Johnston, 23 Ga. App. 261 (2) (98 S. E. 111), and citations.

The only assignments of error were upon certain excerpts from the charge of the trial court, and upon the finding of the jury. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and no material error appears in the portions of the charge excepted to. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowenstein v. Johnston
98 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-gactapp-1927.