Adams v. State
This text of 136 S.E. 330 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for certiorari in this ease set forth that certain evidence was admitted over the objection of the defendant. However, the petition contained no assignment of error upon this ruling, and hence that question could not be considered by either the superior court or this court. See, in this connection, Lowenstein v. Johnston, 23 Ga. App. 261 (2) (98 S. E. 111), and citations.
The only assignments of error were upon certain excerpts from the charge of the trial court, and upon the finding of the jury. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and no material error appears in the portions of the charge excepted to. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-gactapp-1927.