Adams v. State

136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 144
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1927·No. 17778·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The petition for certiorari in this ease set forth that certain evidence was admitted over the objection of the defendant. However, the petition contained no assignment of error upon this ruling, and hence that question could not be considered by either the superior court or this court. See, in this connection, Lowenstein v. Johnston, 23 Ga. App. 261 (2) (98 S. E. 111), and citations.

The only assignments of error were upon certain excerpts from the charge of the trial court, and upon the finding of the jury. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and no material error appears in the portions of the charge excepted to. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 136 S.E. 330, 36 Ga. App. 310, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 47 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

136 S.E. 330 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowenstein v. Johnston
98 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)