Adams v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Adams v. State

435 S.E.2d 36, 263 Ga. 458

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 20, 1993

DocketS93A1219

StatusPublished

This text of 435 S.E.2d 36 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State, 435 S.E.2d 36, 263 Ga. 458 (Ga. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Fletcher, Justice.

David W. Adams was indicted for malice murder, felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court denied his motion to quash the indictment. On April 5, 1993, we granted Adams’ application for interlocutory appeal to consider whether a grand jury, once properly summoned and sworn, must be recharged or resworn before each meeting following a recess.

This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Grace, 263 Ga. 220 (430 SE2d 583) (1993) wherein we held “that a grand jury properly summoned, sworn, and charged to serve during a particular term of the court, may recess and reconvene as it sees fit to conduct its business in the course of that term, and need not be resworn or recharged by the court during that term.” Grace, 263 Ga. at 221.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher, Justice.

David W. Adams was indicted for malice murder, felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court denied his motion to quash the indictment. On April 5, 1993, we granted Adams’ application for interlocutory appeal to consider whether a grand jury, once properly summoned and sworn, must be recharged or resworn before each meeting following a recess.

This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Grace, 263 Ga. 220 (430 SE2d 583) (1993) wherein we held “that a grand jury properly summoned, sworn, and charged to serve during a particular term of the court, may recess and reconvene as it sees fit to conduct its business in the course of that term, and need not be resworn or recharged by the court during that term.” Grace, 263 Ga. at 221.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 S.E.2d 36, 263 Ga. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-ga-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack