Adams v. State

16 So. 3d 260, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11598, 2009 WL 2517050
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 957 So. 2d 1183
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 2009·No. 4D08-4985·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Adams appeals the trial court order summarily denying his motion to enforce plea agreement filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or record attachments refuting his claim that the Department of Correction’s forfeiture of his gain time thwarted the intent of his negotiated plea agreement. See Cioeta v. State, 987 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Hunt v. State, 922 So.2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, FARMER and MAY, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 16 So. 3d 260, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11598, 2009 WL 2517050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 260 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. State
922 So. 2d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cioeta v. State
987 So. 2d 815 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)