Adams v. State
This text of 505 So. 2d 635 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court did not err in denying the appellant’s motion for a mistrial. We do, therefore, affirm the conviction of appellant for battery upon a law enforcement officer.
The trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines solely on the ground that appellant is a habitual offender. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986); Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985). We do, therefore, reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 So. 2d 635, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.