Adams v. State

263 So. 2d 841, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6675

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 So. 2d 723 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 1972·No. No. P-341·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See Adams v. State, 236 So.2d 19 (Fla.App.1970) and Adams v. Wainwright, 445 F.2d 832 (U.S.C.A., 5th Cir., 1971).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 263 So. 2d 841, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6675 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

263 So. 2d 841 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Robert Lee Adams v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division or Corrections, State of Florida, No. 71-1124 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

445 F.2d 832 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Opinion

Related