Adams v. State
164 So. 2d 35, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4255
Opinion
This appeal is from an order denying application for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The order was predicated, inter alia, on the ground of insufficient allegations in the motion to vacate, and must be affirmed on the basis of Dias v. State, Fla. App.1963, 158 So.2d 766. However, there being possible merit in defendant’s plea for relief, we affirm without prejudice to subsequent proceedings on proper motion pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. State, 164 So. 2d 35, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
164 So. 2d 35 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barton v. State
176 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Fauls v. State
164 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)