Adams v. State
This text of 618 So. 2d 732 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We initially accepted jurisdiction of State v. Adams, 600 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on apparent conflict with State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further review of the record and after hearing argument of counsel, we perceive that no actual conflict exists. Accordingly, this review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-fla-1993.