Adams v. State
618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310
Opinions
We initially accepted jurisdiction of State v. Adams, 600 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on apparent conflict with State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further review of the record and after hearing argument of counsel, we perceive that no actual conflict exists. Accordingly, this review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. State, 618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310 (Fla. 1993).
618 So. 2d 732 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hunter
586 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
State v. Adams
600 So. 2d 1302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)