Adams v. State

618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 1993
DocketNo. 80239
StatusPublished

This text of 618 So. 2d 732 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310 (Fla. 1993).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction of State v. Adams, 600 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on apparent conflict with State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further review of the record and after hearing argument of counsel, we perceive that no actual conflict exists. Accordingly, this review is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hunter
586 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
State v. Adams
600 So. 2d 1302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
618 So. 2d 732, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 907, 1993 WL 166310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-fla-1993.