Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

166 So. 2d 926, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1906

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 30, 1964

DocketNo. 1208

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 So. 2d 926 (Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 166 So. 2d 926, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1906 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

HOOD, Judge.

This is a companion suit to the case of Lincombe v. State Farm Mutual Automo[927]*927bile Insurance Company et al., 166 So.2d 920, which is being decided by us on this date. The issues presented in both of these actions are identical and the suits have been consolidated for the purpose of trial and appeal.

For the reasons assigned in the Lincombe case, that portion of the judgment appealed from which dismisses this suit with prejudice as to Travelers Insurance Company is reversed. In all other respects the judgment appealed from is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views which we expressed in the Lincombe suit. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Travelers Insurance Company, the defendant-appellee.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part; and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOOD, Judge.

This is a companion suit to the case of Lincombe v. State Farm Mutual Automo[927]*927bile Insurance Company et al., 166 So.2d 920, which is being decided by us on this date. The issues presented in both of these actions are identical and the suits have been consolidated for the purpose of trial and appeal.

For the reasons assigned in the Lincombe case, that portion of the judgment appealed from which dismisses this suit with prejudice as to Travelers Insurance Company is reversed. In all other respects the judgment appealed from is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views which we expressed in the Lincombe suit. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Travelers Insurance Company, the defendant-appellee.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part; and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 2d 926, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-lactapp-1964.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack