Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

707 S.E.2d 928, 308 Ga. App. 557, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 996, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 238

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 18, 2011

DocketA08A2315

StatusPublished

This text of 707 S.E.2d 928 (Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 707 S.E.2d 928, 308 Ga. App. 557, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 996, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

In State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Adams, 288 Ga. 315 (702 SE2d 898) (2010), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court’s decision in Adams u. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 298 Ga. App. 249 (679 SE2d 726) (2009). The Supreme Court held that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and in denying summary judgment to Randolph Adams. Accordingly, our prior judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, C. J., Smith, P J., Miller, P J., Phipps, P. J., Blackwell and McFadden, JJ., concur. *558 Matthew Nasrallah, Jonah A. Flynn, amici curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

In State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Adams, 288 Ga. 315 (702 SE2d 898) (2010), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court’s decision in Adams u. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 298 Ga. App. 249 (679 SE2d 726) (2009). The Supreme Court held that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and in denying summary judgment to Randolph Adams. Accordingly, our prior judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, C. J., Smith, P J., Miller, P J., Phipps, P. J., Blackwell and McFadden, JJ., concur. *558 Matthew Nasrallah, Jonah A. Flynn, amici curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 S.E.2d 928, 308 Ga. App. 557, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 996, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-gactapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack